Kangaroo (fabrication) trial
Proven fact was a kangaroo court [human guinea pigs remodeling human experiments of short stature and bone softening disease] for [short stature and the human experiments of rickets] for the growth hormone was the fact. (The content proof submitted to the Tokyo District Court, which was submitted to the United States as a judge's disqualification, has been submitted.) The former director of the Tokyo District Court was appointed as a professor at Nihon University. Human rights violations can now be recognized! Moved to the United States and international trials for human rights violations. (Submitted to an international trial)
Overseas, there is the term Kangaroo court.
It refers to a fraudulent trial in which a fraudulent judgment is issued by an organization that attempts to conduct a trial without justice that ignores the rules in order to make the law a trial in its own favor.
In Japanese, it is a kangaroo trial, but it is called a cheating trial, a cheating trial, a private trial, etc. A kangaroo trial means that all evidence has been tampered with, witnesses perjury, and jump with Pyeongpyeong without a legitimate number of trials, depending on the judge's mood or under the direction of the person behind the judge. It is a fraudulent trial that is carried out an abnormal number of times.
It seems that there are several etymologies, but the most promising one is to ignore the normal rules like a kangaroo jumps, and to compare the way the trial goes on without the necessary witness summons. is. There is a record that this phrase was already used in the United States in the mid-19th century. During the California Gold Rush, there were many acts of claim jumping, ignoring the law, buying courts and judges, and stealing them by fraudulent means, whether on the land or money of others. It seems that the claim jumping jump and the kangaroo jump were combined.
Tetsuji Sato of the Tokyo District Court of Nihon University Hospital
It's like "It's like a modern Nihon University Hospital. It is said overseas.
Jimmy's Kangaroo Trial
東京地方裁判所元所長が日本大学の教授に就任していた。これでアメリカでの憲法違反・人権侵害裁判可能！
Jimmy has filed civil suits against three university hospitals. Jimmy's parents had no choice but to attempt a civil trial because police did not arrest them. But for some reason, all lawyers are in the same law firm.
That alone made me feel unusual, but again, Japanese courts had neither human rights nor justice.
Regarding the anomaly of this Japanese court, a director of a well-known investment company in New York and Goldman Sachs decided to accept a bankruptcy sentence one month before Alblast's listing in New York. The judge of the Kobe District Court, who was said to be "the most stupid judge in the world" by securities lawyers such as Disney, and the homepage of the New York Securities Trading Commission, "I do not believe such a fake homepage. I felt it at the time of the abnormal trial of Alblast Co., Ltd. in the world of Chimimoryō, where the bankruptcy trustee of abnormal behavior insisted, but the trial in Japan is really abnormal.
Click here for Alblast's anomalous trial
The same was true for this trial at Nihon University Hospital.
The judge is Tetsuji Sato.
Medical trials, murder trials, and injury cases usually all have something in common.
In short, witness cross-examinations are always conducted in these trials.
Witness cross-examinations are usually conducted in the order of main cross-examination → counter-examination → re-direct exam → supplementary cross-examination.
But Jimmy's trial never allows it all.
Therefore, the cross-examination of Hiroshi Saito, Junichi Suzuki, and Tatsuhiko Urakami was refused, and the witnesses of the doctors prepared from here were also refused.
The following is a conversation with Judge Tetsuji Sato of the Tokyo District Court.
Judge Tetsuji Sato "The trial will be the next decision. 』\
Jimmy's parents "Why? I want a witness cross-examination of the defendant Hiroshi Saito. 』\
Judge Tetsuji Sato "Why ~ (a long ending)? 』
Jimmy's parents: "Of course, it's natural to talk to the parties at trial. Is it wrong. Without cross-examinating the defendant's witnesses in court, the true nature of the crime is unknown. 』\
Judge Tetsuji Sato "Well, that's usually the case. 』
Jimmy's parents "Please call the defendants Hiroshi Saito and Junichi Suzuki to court. Please cross-examine the defendant's witnesses. 』\
Judge Tetsuji Sato "No, I don't have time to call. 』\
Jimmy's parents: What do you mean? Is there such a trial? 』\
Judge Tetsuji Sato "I will decide. Hmm. I see. But you know. This is Japan. So whatever a doctor does in a hospital is not an attempted murder. I will not cross-examine. I will make a decision next time. 』
In addition, Judge Tetsuji Sato said, "800 kcal a day is not a murder crime in Japan. Even in the United States, this is not Japan. I said clearly. However, this word is currently being viewed as a problem overseas. Because 800 calories a day is the calorie that everyone will eventually die, and it's not a normal suffering, and the torture that the most serious criminal in the United States, Guantanamo Camp, is most afraid of is driving 1000 kilos. It seems that he suffers so much that he is said to die from the following calories. Therefore, such acts like torture are serious murder crimes abroad.